General association with cultural factors: Norms/values, Customs/traditions/rituals, Worldviews, Open-mindedness, Individual/collective memory, Local knowledge, Languages, Communication, Rule of law, Power relations, Attitudes toward authorities, Attitudes toward the media, Attitudes toward environmental issues, Gender roles, Age-related roles, Ethnicity, Educational system, Density of active citizenship, Social networks, Social control, Social exclusion, Access and use of infrastructure/services
Recommendations for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions:
Recommendation 1.A for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions
When making leaflets or similar material, whether in print or digital formats, position pictures that instigate negative emotions for the targeted cultural group on the front, as this will enhance preparedness, and position the pictures that instigate positive emotions next to recommendations.
Related cultural factors: Norms/values, Customs/traditions/rituals, Worldviews, Communication
- Deliverable 4.2: Report on “risk cultures” in the context of disasters - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 1.B for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions
In order to make information about disaster risk more salient and meaningful across different cultural groups, it should have an affective code, for instance, by using different symbols to emphasise important details, using letter grades to mark safety data, and/or adding affective descriptions alongside numbers (e.g., excellent, good).
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 4.2: Report on “risk cultures” in the context of disasters - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 1.C for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions
To ensure that citizens with different worldviews and lifestyles are reached out to in disaster preparedness communication, use both time frames: mention immediate consequences, but also life-time concerns.
Related cultural factors: Worldviews, Communication
- Deliverable 4.2: Report on “risk cultures” in the context of disasters - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 1.D for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions
To improve behavioural change in disaster preparedness, promote a “culture to help” by embedding shared cultural values (e.g. Mediterranean family value, or collective memory of neighbourhood help in previous disasters) in behavioural guidelines such as information leaflets or other campaigns.
Related cultural factors: Norms/values, Customs/traditions/rituals, Worldviews, Individual/collective memory, Local knowledge, Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 1.E for implementation by using cultural values and related emotions
Design information brochures that appeal to citizens’ feelings, which are more likely to activate or change behaviour, rather than merely providing “facts” about disaster risks. For example, use altruistic emotions, which are part of cultural value systems, to enhance motivation for preparedness, i.e. appeal to citizens’ feelings of responsibility towards vulnerable others, e.g. family or community members, as a motivator that is stronger than self-protection.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 4.2: Report on “risk cultures” in the context of disasters - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendations for implementation by using (cross-)cultural symbols:
Recommendation 2.A for implementation by using (cross-)cultural symbols
Generally, communication and information campaigns aiming to advise different cultural groups about the disaster risks in their area should be accessible in different languages and through easily understandable (i.e. cross-culturally valid) drawings/symbols to avoid miscommunication, translation errors and semantics misinterpretation in sending messages to citizens with different cultural backgrounds. Such cross-cultural symbols could, e.g., be developed and tested in cooperation with other disaster management authorities across different countries, aiming to establish an “international glossary” of cross-culturally valid safety symbols.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication
- Deliverable 3.3a: Initial report on the impact of best practices prototype implementation - CARISMAND
- pdf, 3.5 MB
- Deliverable 3.3b: Final report on the impact of best practices prototype implementation - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 8.2: Report on the role of the media in disaster risk communication - CARISMAND
- pdf, 5.6 MB
Recommendation 2.B for implementation by using (cross-)cultural symbols
To make use of emotions and cultural identification, information should not consist only of statistical data and “dry” facts but should incorporate narratives, e.g., from other victims that the members of the target group can identify themselves with, or community members.
Related cultural factors: Individual/collective memory, Local knowledge, Communication
- Deliverable 4.2: Report on “risk cultures” in the context of disasters - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 2.C for implementation by using (cross-)cultural symbols
Cross-cultural symbols (e.g., the use of icons) should be thoroughly tested before implementation in different languages / nationalities, and with people from different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds.
Related cultural factors: Norms/values, Customs/traditions/rituals, Languages, Communication, Ethnicity, Socio-economic status
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendations for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods:
Recommendation 3.A for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
To increase the display / visibility of information about disaster preparedness, make use of public or semi-public spaces (e.g., busses, waiting halls, entrance areas of sports stadiums, shopping centres, concert halls), but also private spaces (e.g., hotel lobbies).
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 3.B for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
To improve personal preparedness, promote the setup of personal emergency plans by encouraging family discussions about emergency contacts, meeting points, means of communication, and provide simple reminder “templates” that can be filled and kept (e.g., as a pic on the mobile phone, in the purse, or to stick on the fridge).
Related cultural factors: Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 3.C for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
To improve citizens’ quick and appropriate response in case of a disaster, develop information campaigns that focus specifically on and promotes the identification of “safe spots” or “safe zones” in their homes, their workplaces, and their local area, categorised by (locally relevant) type of disaster.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.3: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 1 (Romania) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.9 MB
Recommendation 3.D for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
To meet citizens’ expectations, provide paper-based information at least once per year, e.g., brochures or leaflets about how to prepare themselves and their family / friends for disasters. This can also be linked with specific initiatives to raise interest and increase impact. Online information is not enough.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 3.E for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
Establish what communication channels will be used in case of a disaster, test them regularly, and ensure that they are accepted and used by the target groups (e.g., train people to use Facebook).
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 8.1: Report on risk communication models and best-practices in disaster management - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 3.F for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
To educate the different target groups about the importance of disaster management and possible coping mechanisms, use also non-traditional ways, e.g. role modelling, soap operas, etc.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 3.1: Report on technologies use and cultural factors - CARISMAND
- pdf, 5.2 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 3.G for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
Explore the possibility of using Bluetooth beacons for push messages that provide information about emergency procedures in the entrance areas or focal spots in mass gathering locations, or when entering tourist attractions, the latter ideally in multiple languages.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 3.H for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
Get in contact with providers of free WiFi in public and private spaces, and ask them for their cooperation by advertising a link to disaster preparedness/response related information sources when a user connects to this WiFi network.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 3.I for implementation by using “physical” aides and methods
Use games and gaming culture to educate and communicate with specific target groups, and to showcase the risks and realities of disasters.
Related cultural factors: Communication
Recommendations for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders/“cultural leaders”:
Recommendation 4.A for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Cooperate with clubs and associations, where members share a specific activity or interest, to disseminate information about disaster preparedness, and recruit their members as proponents/”multipliers”. Cooperate with local Councils to identify such groups which may exist in their area.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 4.B for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Identify groups who share a passion (e.g., sport, hobby) and build on their existing dynamic / team cohesion, i.e. encourage their team leaders to incorporate disaster preparedness in the group’s set of already existing common goals.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 4.C for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Ask providers of computer courses to include the use of / access to websites and social media which provide disaster-related information (e.g., websites or social media sites of Civil Protection) as practical examples in their lessons.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 4.D for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Cooperate with gyms for the recruitment of volunteers and motivators in disaster preparedness activities.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 4.E for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Involve stewards in sports stadiums or other large-scale events, e.g. concerts, who are often trained in safety procedures and wear uniforms which are a visual sign of organised help, in disaster preparedness activities.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 4.F for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
Cooperate with and make use of the skills of hotel, building and shopping centre managers, who combine managerial qualities with specific building / construction knowledge, involve them in disaster planning, and use them to communicate safety procedures.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Access and use of infrastructure/services
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 4.G for implementation by identifying, engaging and cooperating with cultural stakeholders / “cultural leaders”
To foster the fast distribution of disaster information or alerts / warnings, identify and recruit “online volunteers”, e.g. through adverts/banners on social media sites, who would be willing to take up the role of an information distributor in a disaster (risk) situation, using their personal online social networks.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.3: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 1 (Romania) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.9 MB
Recommendations for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers:
Recommendation 5.A for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Develop, in cooperation with educators and psychologists, specific information modules and practical drills that are adapted to the capabilities of young children, and implement/promote them in relevant sites, e.g. both public and private kindergartens.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles
- Deliverable 5.3: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 1 (Romania) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.9 MB
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
- Deliverable 7.3: Report on cultural factors and citizen empowerment - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 5.B for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Children should be involved in risk and disaster management to make the processes more robust and demonstrate greater legitimacy. Such involvement could be achieved by, e.g., using creative arts methodologies.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles
- Deliverable 7.3: Report on cultural factors and citizen empowerment - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 5.C for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Make use of the potential of bi/multi-lingual children as key communicators by contacting school teachers to identify them and provide them with bi/multi-lingual information material about disaster preparedness for their parents who may not speak the local language and / or are suspicious towards authorities.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication, Age-related roles, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 5.D for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Work together with local scouts groups for:
- scouts leaders organising training/drills for kids;
- kids learning how to help other kids; and
- kids “teaching” their parents.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 5.E for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Children’s existing capacities should be nurtured and can support more effective disaster management during all disaster stages. Children can, e.g., pass on information to and involve other family members in disaster awareness raising and planning.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 7.3: Report on cultural factors and citizen empowerment - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 5.F for implementation by using children as communicators and multipliers
Disaster risk reduction policies should include educating children about disaster risks to reduce their vulnerability. Children tend to have a clear and uncluttered view about risks, and their creativity, open-mindedness and enthusiasm can make them catalysts for change.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles
- Deliverable 7.3: Report on cultural factors and citizen empowerment - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendations for implementation related to communication with elderly people:
Recommendation 6.A for implementation related to communication with elderly people
Generally, elderly people are to be seen, heard and understood, have equal access to essential support services and their potential and contribution recognised, valued and supported. This should include adequate consultation and inclusion of older people. For example, they could contribute to conflict resolution and community justice, and they should be encouraged to pass their experience-based coping capacities on to the community, with regard to, e.g., traditional survival systems and appropriate technologies.
Related cultural factors: Individual/collective memory, Local knowledge, Age-related roles, Social networks
- Deliverable 7.3: Report on cultural factors and citizen empowerment - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
Recommendation 6.B for implementation related to communication with elderly people
To reduce the vulnerability of isolated elderly people who may misjudge the risks during an ongoing disaster, which is less “disruptive” regarding everyday routines, e.g. heatwaves or flu epidemics, sensitise those people who may be their only frequent social contact, e.g. small kiosk owners or meal-on-wheel staff, by providing them with basic behavioural / communication guidelines.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 6.C for implementation related to communication with elderly people
Sensitise vulnerable “active pensioners” who may overestimate their own physical capabilities to better protect themselves, by disseminating information via, e.g., charity shops, computer courses for the elderly, or sports groups for pensioners, and use them as information disseminators within their age group.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.3: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 1 (Romania) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.9 MB
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 6.D for implementation related to communication with elderly people
Use the potential of Senior Citizens Organisations and Universities of the Third Age as sources for getting in touch with active pensioners and encourage them to learn and get engaged in disaster preparedness activities.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Age-related roles, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendations for implementation related to communication with foreigners:
Recommendation 7.A for implementation related to communication with foreigners
Cooperate with entities which employ or are in close contact with foreigners/expatriates, (e.g., foreign embassies, chambers of commerce, and/or foreign companies with expatriate staff), to provide their members/employees with disaster-related information and disaster preparedness advice in their respective foreign language.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication, Ethnicity
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 7.B for implementation related to communication with foreigners
Encourage private language schools, which teach the local language to foreigners, to include disaster preparedness and response related topics, e.g., emergency contact numbers, procedures, symbols, in their course material.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication, Ethnicity, Access and use of infrastructure/services
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 7.C for implementation related to communication with foreigners
In tourism areas, encourage hotel, camping site and B&B owners to not only inform their guests about local attractions, but also to include in their “welcome/information pack” guidance about local emergency contacts and local procedures in case of a disaster.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication, Ethnicity, Access and use of infrastructure/services
- Deliverable 5.4: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 2 (Malta) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.4 MB
- Deliverable 5.12: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 3 (Portugal) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 7.D for implementation related to communication with foreigners
Identify language barriers where interpreters may know the respective common language but need to translate information where they may not know the correct words or phrasing in disaster response; ensure such interpreters receive specific training and have the appropriate linguistic and “technical” background in disaster communication.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 7.E for implementation related to communication with foreigners
In multi-cultural areas and touristic regions, focus on the development and usage of mobile phone-based technologies which provide foreigners with multi-lingual messages containing emergency information.
Related cultural factors: Languages, Communication
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendations for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps:
Recommendation 8.A for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
To encourage citizens to submit information to authorities in disaster situations, e.g., via crowdsourcing, but also to provide incident-related individual information, use specifically designed mobile phone apps rather than social media.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 8.B for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
If it is intended to merely provide information to citizens, rather than citizens submitting information to authorities, or information exchange between citizens, both social media and mobile phone apps are equally useful.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 8.C for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
To foster information spread across different communities, local disaster responders should try to become members of “online neighbourhood watch groups”, e.g., Facebook groups, and make use of the extensive network between such groups (via citizens who move their homes but stay in touch with their previous local communities online).
Related cultural factors: Communication, Social networks
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
Recommendation 8.D for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
Set up or improve the Facebook presence of disaster authorities, to build and make use of citizens’ trust in authorities’ information sources online.
Related cultural factors: Communication, Attitudes toward authorities
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 8.E for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
To improve perceived usefulness and acceptance, any mobile phone app specifically designed for disaster-related information should:
- be seen to be led by public authorities, either on national or even supra-national (e.g., EU) level;
- allow authority-to-citizen, citizen-to-authority, and ideally also citizen-to-citizen communication;
- not only be useful in disaster response but also provide information in disaster preparedness; and
- be pre-installed when purchasing a new mobile phone.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Recommendation 8.F for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
To reach those citizens who are not active or frequent social media users but still frequent mobile phone users, make disaster-related information available via mobile phone apps.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.5: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 3 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 1.8 MB
- Deliverable 5.6: Report on citizens’ reactions and opinions: Citizen Summit 4 (Germany) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2 MB
Recommendation 8.G for implementation by using social media and mobile phone apps
Accept the risk of providing redundant information due to the existing multitude of social media channels and mobile phone apps and, rather than attempting to avoid redundancy, perceive overlapping information streams as a strength, given that cultural groups and cultural factors overlap as well.
Related cultural factors: Communication
- Deliverable 5.11: Report on Stakeholder Assembly 2 (Italy) - CARISMAND
- pdf, 2.5 MB
Further reading:
Bossu, R. et al., 2013. The key role of eyewitnesses in rapid earthquake impact assessment. 16 (January).
Chae, J. et al., 2014. Public behavior response analysis in disaster events utilizing visual analytics of microblog data. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), 38(1), pp. 51–60.
Chaudhary, A.G., 2013. Educational Gaming - An effective tool for learning and social change in India. Journal of Creative Communications, 5(3).
Felicio, S.P.A.S. et al., 2014. Stop disasters game experiment with elementary school students in Rio de Janeiro: Building safety culture. In ISCRAM 2014 Conference Proceedings - 11th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84905841714&partnerID=40&md5=929003775d6b684df4a33f4225123680
Finucane, M. L., & Holup, J. L. (2006). Risk as value: Combining affect and analysis in risk judgments. Journal of Risk Research, 9(2).
Fitrianie, S. & Rothkrantz, L.J.M., 2007. A Visual Communication Language for Crisis Management. International Journal, 12(2).
Gampell, A.V. et al., 2017. Beyond Stop Disasters 2.0: an agenda for exploring the contribution of video games to learning about disasters. Environmental Hazards, 0(0). Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2016.1275502
Heeter, C., Hall, E. & Hall, E., 2. Do Girls Prefer Games Designed by Girls? Media and Information, 4(1).
Helsloot, I., & Ruitenberg, A. (2004). Citizen response to disasters: a survey of literature and some practical implications. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 12(3).
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. (May 2). Socio-cultural Engagement and Sensitivity in Disaster Risk Reduction (Vol. Briefing Paper 1). Kathmandu, Nepal.
Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk analysis, 26(3).
Ma, M., Oikonomou, A. & Jain, L., 2011. Serious games and edutainment applications Springer, London. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9
Macklin, C. & Sharp, J., 2012. Freakinʼ hard: Game Curricula about Game Design, Issues and Technology. In Games, Learning and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age.
Margetta, R. & Fitzgerald, C., 2016. Language and earthquakes. Insights in disaster response. NSF - National Science Foundation. Available at: https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?org=NSF&cntn_id=138469&preview=false
Mort, M., Walker, M., Lloyd Williams, A., Bingley, A., & Howells, V. (2016). Final project report for ‘Children, Young People and Flooding: Recovery and Resilience'. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
Plan International. (n.d.) Children and Young People at the Centre of Disaster Risk Reduction: Plan International. Retrieved 09/05/2017 from http://s3.amazonaws.com/inee-assets/resources/doc_1_87_Plan_UK_DRR_Handout.pdf
Red Cross, (n.d.). http://www.ifrc.org/en/publications-and-reports/world-disasters-report/worlddisasters-report-2014/, retrieved from International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, World Disasters Report Focus on culture and risk, 2014.
Ryan, B., 2012. Information seeking in a flood. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 22(3).
Ryu, D., 2013. Play to Learn, Learn to Play: Language Learning through Gaming Culture. ReCALL 25(02), pp.286–301. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=8885230&jid=REC&volumeId=25&issueId=02&aid=8885228&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=
Schott, G.R. & Horrell, K.R., 2000. Girl Gamers and their Relationship with the Gaming Culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 6(4). Available at: http://con.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/135485650000600404
Seabright, M. A. (2010). The role of the affect heuristic in moral reactions to climate change. Journal of Global Ethics, 6(1).
Shaw, A., 2010. What Is Video Game Culture? Cultural Studies and Game Studies. Games and Culture, 5(4).
Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Analysis, 28(3).
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2001). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2010). Affect, moral intuition, and risk. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 387-398.
Tandoc, E.C. & Takahashi, B., 2016. Log in if you survived: Collective coping on social media in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. New Media & Society. Available at: http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1461444816642755
Tierney, K., 2. Disaster response - research findings and their implications for resilience measures. CARRI Research Report, (March). Available at: papers2://publication/uuid/7A40A5E9-8796-4708-90E8-EFF5A6E13ADF
Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Exploring the triangular relationship between trust, affect, and risk perception: A review of the literature. Risk Management, 10(3).
US Congress A failure of initiative: Final report of the select bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina, https://www.gpo.gov/mwginternal/de5fs23hu73ds/progress?id=PDpigWLfdXZaaRhjZpa_fASZvd5xTm5yD62rPxJlg5I,&dl
Zhang, Y., 2013. The effects of preference for information on consumers’ online health information search behavior. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(11).